Sunday 11 December 2016

Stanislavski background

In drama, Konstantin Stanislavski is one of the most influential modern theatre Practitioners.
His method taught is very easy to over-simplify, but in reality is very complex in the world of drama.
He takes the approach that actors should concentrate and inhabit the role that they are playing.
He believes in the importance of motivation in an actor, to put their concentration on their motivation to learn lines  instead of concentrating on only knowing what lines the actor needs to say, this shows there passion for drama.
Stanislavski focuses his technique on actors knowing every detail of there character’s life offstage as well as onstage. In this way he taught us that we can establish him(Stanislavski) as a director and practitioner in his naturalistic productions.
Background information:

he was born in 1863 and died in 1938.
He was born on January 5th in Moscow, Russia as Sergeyevich Alekseyev. His family was descended from slaves but they had improved their lives during the Industrial Revolution as producers and sellers of gold and silver thread. He had a luxury life growing up, he had nine siblings. Their parents often took them to the theatre and to concerts. The children used to recreate the plays they had seen either acting or with the use of puppetry, the parents were artistic so were very supportive. He started acting at the age of 14 and developed his theatre skills. He performed in other acting other groups while working in his family's manufacturing business. He gave himself the name Stanislavski as it was the name of another actor he'd met. He marries a woman called Maria Perevoschikova and  three years later and she joined her husband in the study and work of acting. He founded the Society of Art and Literature in 1888, he performed and directed productions for almost a decade. In June 1986, he and playwright and director Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko decided to open the Moscow Art Theatre, this was an alternative to the normal theatres back then.
He constantly updated his method through inter-disciplinary studies, absorbing from a range of sources and influences, such as the modernist and avant-garde developments, yoga and Pavlovian behaviorist psychology. He introduced group rehearsals and relaxation techniques to achieve better spiritual connections between actors. Pavlovian approach worked well by conditioning actors through discipline in longer, organized rehearsals, and using a thorough analysis of characters. Stanislavski himself was involved in a long and arduous practice making every actor better prepared for stage performance and eventually producing a less rigid acting style. In his own words, Stanislavski described his early approach as "Spiritual Realism." His actors worked hard to deliver perfectly believable performances, as none of his actors wanted to hear his famous verdict, "I don't believe."

As an actor:

Stanislavski starred in several classical plays. His most notable stage performances, such as Othello in the Shakespeare's 'Othello', and as Gayev in Chekhov's 'The Cherry Orchard', were acclaimed by critics and loved by public. His own students said that Stanislavski was a very comfortable partner on stage, due to his highly professional, truthful and reciprocative acting. At the same time, he could be very demanding off stage, because of his high standards, especially during his lengthy and rigorous rehearsals, requiring nothing less but the full devotion from each actor of his company, the Moscow Art Theatre.

TheoriesSome examples of his theories are;
  • Given circumstances - What information you have already about the character such as where and who they are.
  • Emotional Memory - When you draw on a past experience where you have felt the same way as this character is and you bring it in to your role.
  • Objectives - Why we are behaving in a certain way? What we want to achieve.
  • Actions - How your objective is achieved.
  • Magic If - How would the actor behave if they were in the characters situation.
The end?Stanislavski suffered after the Russian Revolution of 1917. Stanislavski's fortune, his factory and all other business property was nationalized by the Soviet Communists, but he survived and was allowed to own his mansion in Moscow. Stanislavski wisely let go of all his wealth and possessions and expressed himself in writing and directing.
In 1928 Stanislavski suffered from a heart attack.


In our performance of the cherry orchid we used props wich links to the movements of neautralism.
we done he majic if excersise in the beginning,before we were introduced to our groupds and it teally helped us get into character.
I used actions with Greek Theatre as it helped me with how to deliver the lines whilst performing i.e when isaid "on my knees i beg you"










Jobs in the industry

in this week we discussed various jobs related to the industry.
with a pair we wrote out what jobs there are in the performing arts industry
The first thing we discussed was what jobs were available in the industry,here a what we came up with as a class:Stunt Double,Director,Light Designer,Agent,Hair and Make-Up,Marketing,Camera Operator,Photographer,Casting Director,Special Effects,Presenting,Director,Actor,Dancer and Singer.
We then looked at what jobs would be involved if we were doing a  weekly  run of The Cherry Orchard, this is what we came up with:
Actors,Wardrobe Designers,Promotion,Prop-makers/ Designers,Costume Designers,Hair and Make-Up,Lighting,Producer,Paramedic,Casting Director,Sound,Lighting,Dancer,Set-Designers,Pyrotechnics,Composers/Conductors.

We then were told to look into a performing job and how we would achieve becoming it.
i looked at nbecoming a director:
Becoming a film director is an aspiration for many people. it takes time and effort.
. Just keep in mind that film directing jobs are highly competitive and it may take years or evendecades to accomplish your goal.

  • watching films- if you are interested in becoming a film director obiously watching films is a key aspect but you can start to use your film viewing experiences as a way to learn about film making. Analysing the films a details is key.
  • To become a director, it is important to get experience and use any means necessary to make your own films. 
  • Acting experience may also be nessisary,it means you already have created a touch "skin" for the performing arts industry and you know what your getting yourself into.
For drama schools you need to show your experiences as an actor,Whether its an actor or directeor its good to have experiences  from all acpects of the industy.

The Cherry orchid Evaluation

On Friday 2nd December we performed our scenes from The Cherry Orchard. We were told we were not able to have a new audience as the level twos were busy in there production of peter pan.
We were also told that we were performing  in the drama studio rather than the theatre as the theatre has heating issues and were performing internally rather than externally so we had to ensure we adapted.
Overall i think my piece went well,we worked well as a group and maintained a good pace,no lines wererushed and we ll played well in the moment.
In the beginning i took everying into concideration and trie to maintain a clear inner monologue.
now I'm used to performing infront of the cass so nerves wasn't a problem and we all knew our lines well so that was fine,i think the only thing my group struggled on was focusing to put everything togeherr.
We recived a lot of constructive criticism as a group and tried to put together our piece involving everythigng.
The props usedhelped me get into character more,i.e my  apron that i used to hold onto,to how the audience my character and the cande i brang.
The part where yepihodv enters didn't give us the reactin we were expecting,probaly because the audience already seen our performance so nothing was new to them.
Altough we didn't expect to get laughs when i rejected his hug.
Everything went well apart from when i frgot to drop the apron and pick it up off the floor.
That was a key moment in showing my ocd in my characterisation as a maid.
We received some general feedback,Rob said that our pieces were delivered well but lacked some  energy he believes its t to do with the fact we weren't in the theatre so in the future we need to make sure we adapt to our surroundings more, however our focus as an audience and as actors was good and our engagement with the audience was good and with each other on stage.
sometimes our pieces were being delivered in a melodramatic way, but this also tied in with the energy being different as we were in a different space.
I kept my object to "Act as a maid at all times,staying proffecional",this really allowed my voice to vary in tone and allowed me to deliver my character to theaudience well.
I enjoyed certain moments a lot especially when me and Anya have the cute scene where we finally see each other again.
This made me think about The book i read "Acting techniques".It outlines the enjoyment i should have as an actor whilst playing my role.
my group worked really well together,there was only one incident in which chief gotmupset that we wearnt rehursing in the other room,but we got through it as a group, with the help of ROb.
We got on with the work and made sure we learnt the lines quickly so we could fcus on the staging a delivery of our performances.
i Applied the Uta Hagen question of "Who am i?" in my performance,making sure i understood my characterin deph and the responces i would give it that situations were in real life.

I enjoyed everyones performances and i though all the characterisation was spot on.
I especially enjoyed ALeks and Pheobes performance.ALkes' characterisation was spot on and she even tired her hair up as if she was a man.I remember her asking Pele about how he sits up from a chair,Hand on knees then rising yourself up and she done exactly that.
While Pheobe showed her innocence and purity as a character throuhh her small body movements and suttle body language.

The Cherry orchid-Week four

This week, we got the opportunity to perform in front of the class as we are prepared i felt more confidence with our performance
here is the feed back we got individually:
  • Keep in the moment
  • Become inventive with thought prosses' and your inner monologue.
  • keep physicality
  • Question why i deliever the word "others" what is the purpose

I took this feedback and instantly worked on it.I thought about my objective for the word "Others" and why i say it when defending Yepihodov,these questions came into my head: " Do i feel guilty for not loving him back" "do i feel sorry for the way hes treated" "Do i feel as if I'm doing something wrong?" .All these questions brang a sense of paranoia into my mind and i began creating a thought prosses in my head,thinking f how i would perform acting truthfully,keeping the fourth wall.
To keep in the moment i had to stayin character throughout y whoe performance,so whilst Pele was delievering his lines i decided to sti stay in role,doing chores ect but listen to what hes saying at the same time,react to the surprising news that his father used to beat him.
To keep my physicality i tried too use the back stage as much as i can,invoving props and have a clear special awarnesss.
Rob then told us to act our script but use our own lines, This was to familiarise ourselves with the emotions our characters present to the audience.
As it was an interpretation,it was funny hearing some of the lies my group came up with.
i changed my morning lines of "two oclock,the birds'll start,then it wil be day" to "wakey,wakey,rise and shine,the birds are making so much noise,i cant wait for the family to arrive!!"
Thisn was a very funny excersise.
Myfavorite was ROse who played Dunyashka She had the line to me saying "Varya!,Coffee for ma'am" she changed it to "Varya!,get me a coffee now".It was odd hearing her say it as I'm used to her saying the scripted lines but it was interesting because i noticed more energy was pput into that than before.
My group were luckily able to practice in the other room,where we got more peace and quite.
Sara wanted to go over the scene betweek me and her in which she admres her room as she missed it so much.She wanted us,as a group to help her keep the fourth wall as she got mixed up with the greek theatte pieces where we broke it.
Me and ROse analysed her body language and delivery whilst performing,we notied she had no snece of imagination,i told her to imagine you were on holiday and you come back to your house,that feeling.This limks to the excersise we did before of emotional memory,putting in a circumstance in an imaginary one.
Ths worked very well an instantly Sara kept the fourth wall.
We were now nready for our performance.

The Cherry orchid -Week three

By his week my group knew most of /all of our lines and were off script
weknew our lines but there were times when we would end up forgetting them so we just kept running through the script until we were satisfied.
Me and Pele were quite confident with our scene already so we went straight into the ther scenes.
My fvorite scene when Chief entered as Yepihodov.
We made this scene very comical and made Yepihodov act a nervous wreck in fron t of  vVarya.
My objective in this scene was to act confused and frustrated with Yepihodovs presence and not pay him much attention.
We wanted flowers as a prop to create the comical scene of Yepihodov cting nervous and confused around Varya.
After Peles long speech we struggled on figuring out te staging for us all so decided to add an extra seat in which i could go on to when i have my line: "i ffeel as if I'm going to faint".
we didn't know what a "kvass" is and Rob explained to us that it was a drink.My objective became clear now as i had to get Pele (Lopahin) a drink
At the end of the scene Chief left nervously and we decided that i could reject his hug to show my uniterest.
Then we added an action which me and Pele done together in my line:"Until he  stats taking", we both shoock our heads in disappointment and our other group members-Jessica, Rose and Sara said this worked well in the performance.
The next key scene i was in was between me and Anya.After doing my esearch i noticed they has a sibling loving connection and they were both good friends.
Whennanyas mother leaves stage instantly we wanted to show the audience there strong bond as characters,so we decided to have them both hug each oter as soon as there alone.This shows there value and love as characters.
As we were doing Stanislavski we couldn't break the fourth wall, so while talking about the cherry orchard we acted as if there was an open fieldmof grass and we were staring out to the cherry orchard from the house this meant that the cherry orchard was the fourth wall.
Our piece flows very well now with less static movements.
Luckily all pupils in my group get along so we have no argument and just get on with the work.
We all show a clear understanding of the play and seem to enjoy it much better,especially when knowing about character realtionships.

The Cherry Orchid-Week Two

The day after the Weekend,i knew it was going to be a hectic week...
we started working on our work for our script.My group got together an we simply line read, as none of us learnt anylines over the weekend we were all glued to our scripts.
Me and Pele started acting out our scene and on stage we decided to have a table (in which i was to place the candle) and a chair which pele was sitting on as i came in from back stage.
Our characters weairdly came natural to us which is unusual as me and Pele have never worked together before.We saw and instant connection between bth character which seemed like a sibling love?
Pele realised he had a large amount of speech so we decided to cut some lines frm it.
I thughas it is the first week we both played our characters well,even withough research.
Me and pele then discovered his character had a stutter,which he payed very well.
My charscter (Varya)n is a maid,i deacided to be stereotypical acting very polite and welcoming,obeying orders and cleaning the house(imaginary).
We discussed our objectives as a group and individuals.My objective was to listen to Pele as he talks about his past.
Rob wanted to the beginning of my groups performance,
the challenge for me wa knowing what to do whilst Pele says his long speech.i was confused as we only had this morning to rehurse but got on with it anyway.As an actor you have to put yourself in difficult situations to achieve your goal.
Me and Pele had a nervous tone in our vices as e didn't know the lines yet and our staging wasn't quite to scratch.
my first line "two oclock" was the opening line,i had to come in holding a candle ut i had no prop so imagined it in my hand,then placing it on the table.
Throughtout Peles speech i didn't know what to do,i wasn't quite farmiliar with my characer so instead of acting as a maid i created stillness,just listening to Pele,creatting an innermonologue in my head.
After we performed we got a surprising reaction of claps and smiles.Iwas confused as i thought the performance wasn't good with 45 miniutes practice...
This is the feed back me and pele got:
Pros-
  • Good thought prosses(especially when Pele was saying his speech)
  • Naturalistic responces
  • light and radical
  • lovely stillness from me as Varya
Cons-
  • Sustain objects throughout
  • reacreate the play,make it your own,read over the synopsis to help outline your objectives as characters
  • Remember actions exsist in stillnesss.
  • Create purposeful actions (how you achieve the need)
  • Through actions emotions flow
  • Play the moment,using the system of a given circumstance
All this was very good and clear contructive criticism,which me and Pele will put into our performance next time.

The next daywe started to look at some reviews of the cherry orchard.
We read through these as a class and found different points from the reviews that we could somehow put in ur pieces. After we ran over our pieces and line read. We line ran to ensure that we could understand the script portraying different emotions.
then we develop our characters based on what they were portrayed as and how they were seen by other characters in the play. After a bit of research and watching the scene my group is going to perform,i noticed my character(Varya) is very polite and gentle,she is swift in her movements and acts perfectly as a maid,she has very close relationships with some members of the familyand is loved dearly by Yepihodov. 
We were given cut out image of a stick man and told to write everything we learnt about our character on the paper:



Cherry orchid -Week one

This we looked at Stanislavski's work.we listed techniques next to definitive. We did an observation exercise, we did a given circumstance exercise, a magic if exercise and the read through the script.

We did an exercise where were given acircumstance,we had to imagine what its ike to be a homeless person in the streets who is absolutely freezing. None of us had this experience,so it was very hard forus to imagine this so wewee told to  all used the emotional memory of freezing in the cold to bring up real life emotions.This was easyfor me as i get really cold easily and as it is winter i was cold in the morning from getting to school.I used that emotional memory in the excersise.
we then had to create a back story in our heads of why we became homeless and how.
Then we had to imagine that we were asking someone for money in our head to then get angry and portray this inner monologue verbally. This exercise was very interesting for meand helped us to get us in to character,i enjoyed the way i gotdeep into my emtions linking my emotional memory with a currently imaged circumstance.
As an actor when you cant relate to a situation its good to use emotional memory whilst playing your role,it sets the same scene and atmosphere very well.
We then did an observation exercise with a partner of our choice,i worked with Georgia and we were gven a picture in which in turns we looked at for thirty seconds and then turned it back over and had to remember  as much as we could in the picture to our partner and vice versa.
This excersise was very difficult for me as an actor as i have very bad memory.
Me and Georgia were given a picure of Jesus and his disciples,all i could remember was one of the desiples pointing at a table,an unsuccessful excersise.
Our next excersise involved looking at our partner for thirty seconds,then shuting our eyes and describing  everything about our partner to our partner. This really helped to notice small details about a person and understand other people.
Georgia mentined my highlights and my brown eyes.It was interesting to see the thought prosses as she was relaying the information she gathered about my looks back to me and made me think about how to successfully  show the audience a thought prosses.
We tried many different exercises and learnt many Stanislavski methods.
Ourv last exercise before we got our scriptswas where we matched up the definitive to the technique,i was in a group with Juan and Hayden,here is what we completed:
before the holidays we were introduced to the script for the first time, we read it over the holidays but reading it as a group and giving parts for the read through only really helped me understand  the play a lot more and made it come to life. My Character of Varya the maid will be interesting.
some people were not happy withthere roles but Rob brought us into realisation that we can make our characters our own and as this is not a greek theatre piece we will have a different manourism and approach to te play.

Poetry

We were taught an interesting lesson by Rob in which we were given a poem and we had to recite it to the class.
ive never performed oetry properly before and it was interesting to see how my class mates would deliver it.We were taught about the importance of the voice in our acting careers by Rob and it really helped us with our pronuonciation of verbs and words.
i learnt that as an actor you always have to ask yourself where am i and who am i (linking to the Uta Hagen technique).Poetry is normally involving a speaker or character addressing a specific audience,it is good to get ractice with speaking  individually to an audience,it buids up confidence and expression.
We looked at the poem of "Ozymandias" by percy Bysshe we read uit as a class to familiarise ourselves with the poem.Rob told us to focus on the voice and pronnounciation of the poem but mostly enjoy it!
Whenni performed i was quite nervous but i took into concideration of what Rob said.
the first line: "I met a traveller from an antique land" i hit the pronounsiation of "T" very well and spoke in a well mannored way.
i really took time in my performance and moved my voice with control.
I messed up a few words because i was unsure of how to pronounce them but Rob quickly helped me.
We were able to play aroud with the lines as we were not given a charcter to act whilst speasking,altjhough that would have been quite interesting.
i took into mind the gramma i.e the commas and where to pause in the poem.
If in was given that task next time i would have liked more time to go over the Poem.
It would have flowed more off my tonge although this excersise has really heped me with my diction and pronousiation of ords.

Camden youth theatre Workshop

In todays lesson we had a workshop lesson lead by Gemma,a teacher from the Camden youth theatre.
Our main focus of this lesson was movement and interacting with others,devising and physical theatre.
We started of with an engergectic physical warm arm to loosen our bodies.
We stood in an equidistant circle  and were tod bounce on the spt.
We then had to invokve our arms and legs shaking them as we bounced.Loud music was paying in the background and a lot of energy was put into our movemebt,we created a lively atmosphere.
this warm up helped us preare for the hysical theatre excersises we were going to take part it later,it also warmed us up as the there gets very cold in winter.
We then got into pairs and shared individually on what we thought devising was.
Me and Georgia came up with the definition that: Devising is "Inventing/creating  a fresh piece of drama using your imagination".
Gemma then told us to walk around the space,whilst we done this she shouted out pharases such as :Walk around the space as if you were rushing to goo somewhere","move as if you were in a hurry" Automattically we were put into imaginay circumstances,my thought was to imagine if i was late and rushing to college.
Whilst we were walking around the space Gemma gave us a set of instructions to follow,
She shouted "Centre" -This meant everyone had to gravitate quickly towards the centre of the theatre.
She then shouted" Clear the space" and told us that when we were told to clear the space, it meant to clear the space and go to the edge of the space.
When she shouted "Favourite" we had to point to our favourite person or thing in the room(Obviously i pointed to myself).
When she shouted "Fold" everyone had to go as low down as possible,bending our knees touching the floor,and when she said "Unfold"  we had to go out from our postion(fold)and reach as high up as possible.
Our last Ignore was "Hide" This meant we had to find a way to hide in the space.
We played this game a few times following thwe intructions Gemma gave us,it has gave me disapline as an actor and has helped with my listening skills.
whilst repeating this activity she sometimes told us to disobey her orders and we had to do the complete opposite of what she said for example unfold would mean fold.
Our next task was to get into groups and create still images and become objects.
My group became a book,i was the spine and with there arms Hayden and Tobi were the pages.Gemma then had to guess what it was and unfortunately was unsuccessful.This excersise made us work quickly and had our imaginations running wild.

My favorite part of the lesson was trust excersises and physical work.
i worked will William and found it very hard to complete the physica work we had to do.
one excersise involved falling in to our partners arms, another excersise involved pushing your backs together to get yourselves down on to the floor,this one was very challenging for me and i was almosyimpossible for me to get back up frpm the floor but My partner William and I adapted to the situation with the help of Gemma. We then were told tha we had to create a prison break scene using the moves we  just learnt.Me and will started with a jump,then a back to back excersise but as i couldn't get up from the ground we decided to roll on the flor and pretend we were spys.
For me and Wilkam there excersises were quite difficult,probably because there was a lack of trust from both sides.
Our last task was to do with devising but before we got into this we had to write abouth something important to us.
I wrote about money and concluded to the question "How can i make more money?"
We got put into 5 groups and 5 questions were picked at random,my groups question was "Why do some perope make it in life,and others don't"
this was written by Pele who was in our group and automatically i had ideas of hw w could perform the piece using physical theatre.
I had the idea that me and Pele could be back to back sitting down and on the lines "Why do some people make it in ife"We would raise up to show levels and prgresssion.
Even though i found it challenging perfore i mnaged to do the exercise with Pele,maybe its because we are of the same height.I thenthought that on the lines "And others don't the rest of the group could do the same thingbut go down (showing failure).
As the piece was not long enough me and Pele thought we could say "Connections" in response to the question whilst leaning back and holding arms.
Our performance was very good and we gotgood feedback from Gemma


Musical theatre,Dncers and music students review

I was very intrigued by all the other performances and you can tell a lot of effort was put into it all.
It was interesting to see the musical theatres performance of Medea,as they had a smaller group less lines were needed in the erformance.
my favorite part of that performance was the chorus part where they all spoke in unison,this drew my attention and really caught me as an audience member,however at times they were not clear with what they were saying,some wrds where said to fast and I didn't understand what they were saying.
The nhigh energy levels were consistent throughtout wich kept my attention drawn to the piece.
As indivuduals I think they dilived the piece very well.

The dancers were my favorite,what I really liked about there performance was the music they danced to,it wasn't a song it was more like a speech.It was in French so i couldn't understand what they were saying.
i noticed that the dancers were telling a story with there movement.
i watched my friend Dezire (a dancer in the performance) and analysed her movement,she started slowly,doing simle twisys and turns with a partner,then as the music/sound nwent on her movements became larger and more aggressive,turning into jumps and twists.
This was interesting for me to see and as having done ballet for five years when i was younger i understood the amount of work nd effort all the dancers had to put in to make the piece.
The only downfall in the performance was the length of othe pece,im not sure if they had to perform for that long but it became quite cear that the audience became uninterested,also a lot of moves were repeated.The dancers had an amazing sence of special awareness and used the whole stage.
I didn't see anyone mess u anything however i saw a few of the dsncers loose concentration and smile during there performance.

The music students were fantastic.
My favorite performance was Michael Jacksn.
All singers performed withnconfidence and were very clear,they performed with a lot of enthusiasm.
One boy performed Bruno mars and wasn't confident enough to finish,i think he done a fantastic job.
i noticed groups were positioned so all members of the audience could hear them,individually.
The singers were accompanied by a band,they all played everynote with no mistakes,verty talented.
they were all focused a prepared,the energy levels even got the audience joining in.



Greek Theatre evaluation

Acting the play Oedipus was very challenging at times as my focus sometimes was more on remembering the lines of the piece rather then the actual performance and focusing on my characterisation, however I believe that one of My main strengths in my performance was my characterisation, being able to maintain it through the whole piece, Even though Emily's character was quite comical and the audience laughed, it wasn't a major distraction and I was able to maintain full focus and concentration when performing.
Within performing the piece I am happily able to say that both Dijarn and Emily performed very well maintaining a strong presence on stage, we all had a strong connection/bond as actors off stage and on and after watching back our performance(witch I will link near the end) I believe that it really showed in our performance, I know There were many strong moments in our piece particularly our voice projection and diction as a group, the video of our was taken in the audience and everything was clearly heard
No one stumbled over words witch was very good.
I also realised our delivery of speech was linked with our staging i.e. When I was down stage in the beginning of the play my vocal projection was quite low compared to when me and DIjarn performed the argument we were both upstage and our voices were louder so the sound could travel right to the back of the audience, this was very clear in the video..
A very strong moment captured in the performance was when me as Jocasta and Dijarn as Oedipus had an argument regarding the discovery of Oedipus, past and the Shepherd.
In the clip as the argument begun I could clear gasps from the audience.
As I was performing this  scene I remember the tension in the atmosphere, our energy was intense and we delivered it in a fast pace witch helped it become more believable to the audience, I know what your thinking, a fast paced delivery of speech means a rushed  performance, well... not exactly, me and Dirjarn really wanted to make this scene realistic, of course because Miesner taught us that acting is "behaving truthfully in imaginary circumstances", we went over this scene many times on the day of our performance  putting into mind Uta hagns technique, using the three questions, mainly focusing on the question "What do I want", so what are our objectives in the moment as my our characters. As we both done research and had background knowledge on our characters we both had a clear understanding of our objectives. We then imagined we were a modern couple arguing, when putting this into practice it really helped delivering our performance especially when I got on my knees and said: "On my knees I beg you" begging Oedipus not to continue, scared she he will ruin his reputation.Dijarn gave a strong outburst of "that's enough", the sound echoed in the audience and I stayed in character putting into mind everything we practiced involving the uta hagen technique and remembering to act in response to my fellow actor.
I learnt as an actor it is key to stay in role otherwise you wont be believable to the audience, luckily we were all truthful in our performance.
Another key strength we had whilst performing was our staging, this gradually improved throughout our
lessons as we got good feedback on it and how to improve.
our performance travelled on stage and as a group we had to have special awareness keeping in mind the audiences view of our performance. The way we staged our interpretation of the text was unique compared to the other groups as we had a plan of moving across stage and when it came up to the "dramatic "scene between me and Dijarn we would end up Add to dictionary groups like Aleks, group had there piece mainly centre stage, so there main focus was grabbing the audiences attention and making sure the audience was completely focused in there piece.
The staging in our performance linked with dominance as characters for example, my character Jokasta is a more dominant character than Emily who plays the slave, so in the beginning I was upstage facing the audience and emily was behind facing towards me,i decided to do this to make it obious to the audience what characters we played because if we were side to side the audience may have not understood what we were doing.
I believe that staging also made it interesting to the audience, normally if theres a long piece of speech the audience may loose interest and concentration, but the audience was completely focused in our performance, I now this because of the reactions we got in some parts of our  performance(laughter, shock),this shows that we had a good communication with the audience.
We listened to our actors and had thought prossess, this was clear when Jokasta told Oedipus his father is dead and he was going to be crowned king,Emily had no speech until I left but had a good thought presses whilst we were speaking,she showed a clear understanding of characterisation and stayed in role even when she had no speech.
After watching the performance I noticed I had a range of different tones witch fitted well with my characterisation in different pars of the performance for example in the beginning the opening line I said calmly was "we return your greeting,you bring us news?",this fitted well with the context of that part of the performance, I said it in settle tone,trying to make Jokasta seem unprepared for the news she was about too hear.After hearing about Oedipus' fathers death my tone was sharp and my voice got louder,this worked well with the audience and helped with characterisation.
Although our characterisation was clear,i feel like we could have improved our exiting off stage. I think all of us failed to exit sage with a purpose and from the video it looked odd and didn't fit well with our performance.
After esearching the acient greek thetre background and watching clips of actors in that era,all actors left the performing stage with a purpose,even with masks on they were still able to show clear transitions leaving and entering stage.
We were given feedback on this but wen concentrated more on staging and characterisation.
I leant as an actor it is important to take feedback seriously as it does affect the overall outcome.
Another thing to improve on where our hands.We all nstruggles with knowing what to do withn our hands and in the performance sometimes we would fiddle with one hand whilst speaking,this shows our nervousness as actors and it was very distacrtin,it too away from our performance and was a big default when perfrming.In the performance after looking back at the video I noticed in the bggining scene with Emily I moive my right hand a lot to the audience,im not sure why I done this...in the moment it felt right but after looking back at it now it looks quite awkward as an audience member.It would probably looked better if my hands were side to side,straight down.
overall I think our performance would have been a lot better without these drawbacks but it helps me as an actor understand what I need to improve on next time.
Here is a link to our performance :

This clearly showed where our main focuses were

My first initial thought of the play was that it was going to be a challenging performance.
I was not interested in the text at first because I thought the roles were boring compared to the others,but after researching the charactters and watching the play I realised hw interesting it could be and how we could ake it our own.After reading the book  "Acting techniques" by Micheal Powll  I realised as an actor you may not like the roles you are given,but it is importsnt you explore different characters and go out of your comfort zone,agencies are looking for people that can play different roles for different jobs.
The Uta Hagen technique helped me find identity as a character,it helped me develop awareness of my surroundings when playing my role and helped me act with real human emotions.
Our main fcus as a group was Uta Hagens question of "what would you do".
We had toput ourselves in imaginary circumstances to really act truthfully in our role,discusing  in rehursals how we would feel if we were actually in thae situations.

In the next project we do I want to focus on my punctuation as an actor.Delievering my words clearer to the audience,to help me do this I need to keep practicing tounge twister and cnstanants.
I would also like to be able to step out of my comfort zone when acting,delivering my inner monolougue through my thought prosseses,i believe my inner monolouges could be improved by looking over Uta hagens technique,focusing on the six questions she taught.